Pipelines in CI/Selective runs in CIData Engineer

How do I run only the assets that changed using GitLab CI?

Add a job to .gitlab-ci.yml that installs the Bruin CLI and runs bruin run ./pipeline --downstream. It builds the changed assets plus everything downstream of them, instead of the whole project. Store warehouse credentials as GitLab CI CI/CD variables, and use a resource_group so two deploys can never write the same tables at once. Keep validation and deployment as separate jobs: validation should be fast and credential-free, deployment serialised and gated.

Command

bruin run ./pipeline --downstream

Defined in

YAML + CI

Works with

GitLab CI + Bruin CLI

What you get

Selective runspipelines as codegit-based rollback

How to do it

  1. 1

    Create or open .gitlab-ci.yml in your repository.

  2. 2

    Install the Bruin CLI as a step: curl -LsSf https://getbruin.com/install/cli | sh.

  3. 3

    Add bruin run ./pipeline --downstream as the job's command.

  4. 4

    Store warehouse credentials as GitLab CI CI/CD variables, never in the repository.

  5. 5

    Add a resource_group so concurrent runs cannot write the same tables.

  6. 6

    Make the job required for merge, so a failure actually blocks.

How it works in code

# .gitlab-ci.yml
- run: curl -LsSf https://getbruin.com/install/cli | sh
- run: bruin run ./pipeline --downstream

Run bruin run ./pipeline --downstream and GitLab CI fails the build when the pipeline does, before the change reaches production.

Worth knowing

A job that reports failures without failing the build gets ignored within weeks. Make it required. And give CI its own warehouse connection pointed at a scratch schema, because a pull request can come from anywhere and should never hold production credentials.

Other ways to do this

Bruin is not always the right answer. Here is where the alternatives are stronger.

OptionWhen it is the better choice
BruinWire bruin run ./pipeline --downstream into GitLab CI so pipeline changes get checked the same way application code does.
dbt in CIThe same pattern with dbt build and a state-based selector. Well documented, and the right choice if dbt is already your transformation layer.
A managed orchestratorTools like Dagster or Prefect Cloud handle scheduling and retries more richly than a CI runner, at the cost of another system to run.
Soda in CISoda's data-contract checks are the strongest documented option if formal contracts between teams are the main goal.

Common questions

How do I run data pipelines in GitLab CI?

Install the Bruin CLI in a job and run bruin run ./pipeline --downstream. Validation needs no warehouse credentials; deployment reads them from GitLab CI CI/CD variables.

How do I stop two GitLab CI deploys running at once?

Use a resource_group. Two pipeline runs writing the same tables concurrently is the hardest data bug to diagnose, and it is entirely preventable.

Should validation and deployment be separate GitLab CI jobs?

Yes. Validation should run on every pull request, take seconds, and need no credentials. Deployment should run on merge, be serialised, and be gated. Combining them makes validation slow and deployment unsafe.

Deploy data pipelines like software

Open source. Validate on every pull request, deploy on merge, roll back with git.

Sign up to our newsletter

Practical updates on open-source data pipelines, AI analysts, governance, and what we are shipping at Bruin.

The signup form is hosted by Brevo. Allow marketing cookies to load it.